Cases 1 - 10 of 22
SOSA v. CORA et al
as 1:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
JUAN SOSA
Defendant:
MARK CORA, BAYSIDE STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATOR, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOSA v. WOOLSON et al
as 1:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
JUAN SOSA
Defendant:
SERGEANT WOOLSON and S.S.C.F. ADMINISTRATOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERMENTER v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2022cv02892
Petitioner:
RYSHEEN PERMENTER
Respondent:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBORAH I. CARPENTER, JOHN J. TALABER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sosa v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00770
Plaintiff:
Jorge Sosa
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HECKER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2021cv02701
Defendant:
SEARGENT WHARTON, JIMMY KIMMEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R HECKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOSA v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05721
Plaintiff:
JOSE MANUEL ALBERTO SOSA
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
SOSA v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2020cv13709
Defendant:
C. SAUL, STATE OF NJ DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ANDREA D. PHILLIPS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE RAUL SOSA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NELSON v. REYNOLDS et al
as 5:2019cv02009
Defendant:
STEVEN MILLER, CO SCOTT REYNOLDS, CLIFFORD KNAPPENBERGER and others
Plaintiff:
SHAKA BEKOE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. GUARDUCCI et al
as 2:2019cv08735
Defendant:
OFFICER A. SOSA, R. SCHARPRICK, D. BURK and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOSA v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2018cv03537
Petitioner:
JUAN SOSA
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ___________________, MARK GARMAN and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
