Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MCKINNEY v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, RAJIV SHAH, PRESIDENT JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randy Baadhio v. Brian Hofacker, et al
as 17-2749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFACKER, Detective, MTPD, SEAN SULLIVAN, Police Officer, MTPD, ROBERT PALMER, Chief of Police and others
Randy Baadhio v. Brian Hofacker, et al
as 17-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN HOFACKER, Detective MTPD, SEAN SULLIVAN, Police Officer, MTPD, ROBERT PALMER, Chief of Police, MTPD and others
MCMENAMIN v. CHIURCO et al
as 3:2015cv08636
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MCMENAMIN
Defendant:
ANTHONY CHIURCO, ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL and DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOSA v. ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2014cv01736
Plaintiff:
JOSE RAUL SOSA, JR.
Defendant:
ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL and RAJIV K. SHAH, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2013cv05372
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ORTIZ
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISTY v. ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2012cv03848
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CHRISTY
Defendant:
ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL, DR. SOFFER, JOSEPH WYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNES v. ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
as 3:2011cv04812
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
ST. FRANCIS HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Lopez v. Correctional Med Serv, et al
as 11-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL MED SERV, LOUIS TRIPOLI, WILLIAM ANDRADE and others
Bienvenido Casilla v. NJ State Prison, et al
as 09-3450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BIENVENIDO CASILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
NJ STATE PRISON, GEORGE E. ACHEVE, MD, RAYMUND T. TAGLE, MD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
