Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Fahmy v. Phelps et al
as 1:2018cv01997
Defendant:
Lt. Burman, RN Irene Fuh, RN Eric Neba and others
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Fahmy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermaine Carter v. Robert Coupe, et al
as 16-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT COUPE, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, LARRY SAVAGE, Disciplinary write up hearing officer, MICHAEL WELCOME and others
Carter v. Coupe et al
as 1:2015cv01100
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Carter
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, Larry Savage, Michael Welcome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Coupe et al
as 1:2015cv00972
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Carter
Defendant:
Robert Coupe, David Pierce, Larry Savage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Dickens v. Taylor, et al
as 15-1464
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN TAYLOR, RICHARD E. SEIFERT, ANTHONY RENDINA and others
James Biggins v. Robert Burns, et al
as 14-4582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
ROBERT M. BURNS, BERRY BURNMAN, JOHN BURTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA, RONALD L. WILEY, JAMES SCARBOROUGH and others
Biggins v. Burns et al
as 1:2014cv00995
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Robert M. Burns, Berry Burnman, John Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Dickens v. Taylor, et al
as 13-2533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN TAYLOR, RICHARD E. SEIFERT, ANTHONY RENDINA and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Robinson v. Scarborough et al
as 1:2012cv01401
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
James Scarborough, Troy Thompson, Argawal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
