Cases 1 - 10 of 82
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY $603,593.90 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXXX4480 HELD IN THE NAME OF DREWSAMEL GROUP LLC
as 2:2024cv02551
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $603,593.90 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXXX4480 HELD IN THE NAME OF DREWSAMEL GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v $71,781.07 IN FUNDS FROM FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT XXX-XXX807 HELD IN THE NAME OF ANTHONY M. PALMER
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$71,781.07 IN FUNDS FROM FIDELITY INVESTMENTS ACCOUNT XXX-XXX807 HELD IN THE NAME OF ANTHONY M. PALMER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $47,014.85 IN FUNDS FROM INVESTMENT ACCOUNT XXX-XX0519 HELD IN THE NAME OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AT TD AMERITRADE IN LONE TREE, COLORADO
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$47,014.85 IN FUNDS FROM INVESTMENT ACCOUNT XXX-XX0519 HELD IN THE NAME OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AT TD AMERITRADE IN LONE TREE, COLORADO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $22,190.07 IN FUNDS FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NO. XXXXXX595 HELD IN THE NAMES OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AND ANTHONY M.PALMER
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$22,190.07 IN FUNDS FROM JP MORGAN CHASE BANK ACCOUNT NO. XXXXXX595 HELD IN THE NAMES OF ANTHONY T. PALMER AND ANTHONY M.PALMER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 2:2023cv22312
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY $1,362,727.64 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN BUCKEYE STATE BANCSHARES, INC. ACCOUNT NO. 312026 HELD IN THE NAME OF JJF CONSTRUCTION LLC and APPROXIMATELY $1,642,755.55 FORMERLY ON DEPOSIT IN F&M BANK AND TRUST COMPANY ACCOUNT NOS. 5106230, 200025521, AND 1005278 HELD IN THE NAME OF KENT D. WARNING DBA PAYOFF ACCOUNT SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $318,900 SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXXX4146 HELD IN THE NAME OF PRESTIGE SHIPPING INC.
as 2:2023cv02927
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$318,900 SEIZED FROM BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT NUMBER XXXXXXXX4146 HELD IN THE NAME OF PRESTIGE SHIPPING INC.
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. All funds held by Wells Fargo in Checking Account XXXX, et al.
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All funds held by WELLS FARGO in Checking Account 8094712810, All funds held by WELLS FARGO in Savings Account 8100795270, All funds held by FIDELITY INVESTMENTS in Account Z05-837502 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $58,273.51 PREVIOUSLY HELD AT GEMINI TRUST CO. LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02275
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$58,273.51 PREVIOUSLY HELD AT GEMINI TRUST CO. LLC and $1,030.97 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN CITIBANK, N.A. ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING 7429
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $517,765.77 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN SBERBANK MAGYARORSZAG ZRT ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING 0008, HELD IN THE NAME OF KIEMELT MAGYAR EPITOIPARI KFT
as 2:2021cv17938
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$517,765.77 PREVIOUSLY HELD IN SBERBANK MAGYARORSZAG ZRT ACCOUNT NUMBER ENDING 0008, HELD IN THE NAME OF KIEMELT MAGYAR EPITOIPARI KFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Approximately $147,800.00 in U.S. Currency seized from a safe deposit box at People's Bank held by Rayna Homan
as 1:2018cv00756
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $147,800.00 in U.S. Currency seized from a safe deposit box at People's Bank held by Rayna Homan
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
