Cases 11 - 20 of 124
RIVAS v. PHILLIPS PRECISION MEDICRAFT
as 2:2020cv08740
Defendant:
PHILLIPS PRECISION MEDICRAFT
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL RIVAS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHLUDZINSKI v. NWPA PIZZA, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00163
Defendant:
NWPA PIZZA, INC., DOE CORPORATION 1-10, PAUL MOHTASHEMI and others
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP CHLUDZINSKI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PHILLIPS v. DRS PRODUCT RETURNS, LLC
as 5:2020cv00805
Defendant:
DRS PRODUCT RETURNS, LLC
Plaintiff:
LANA PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 260
SHOOK v. GCA SERVICES GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01199
Defendant:
GCA SERVICES GROUP, INC. and ABM INDUSTRIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SHOOK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
NEW JERSEY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDICS, LLC v. PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY et al
as 2:2018cv11255
Defendant:
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, JOHN DOE (1-100) and XYZ CORP. (1-100)
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY SPINE AND ORTHOPEDICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALICEA et al v. CITY OF CAMDEN
as 1:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN ALICEA , RUBIN ALICEA, JR. , WILLIAM F. ARMSTRONG and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
JOHNSTON et al v. TITAN LOGISTICS & RESOURCES, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01617
Plaintiff:
GLENWOOD JOHNSTON , LADEL RICHARDS , TRACY GUINARD and others
Defendant:
TITAN LOGISTICS & RESOURCES, LLC, TONY DIGIAMBERDINE, BEEMAC TRUCKING and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHAVERS v. LIMO EXPRESS INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06704
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP SHAVERS
Defendant:
LIMO EXPRESS INC., THOMAS JOHNSON and ALICE BELTHOFF
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PHILLIPS v. RICE ENERGY, INC.
as 2:2017cv01150
Plaintiff:
TIM PHILLIPS
Defendant:
RICE ENERGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KRILEY v. IBM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2016cv01860
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP KRILEY
Defendant:
IBM CORPORATION and IBM CORPORATION RESOURCE ACTION SEVERANCE PLAN
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal - ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
