Cases 31 - 40 of 84
HATFIELD et al. v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al.
as 1:2017cv01064
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50 and PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ARLYN ADASCZIK and NICOLE TAYLOR-WORTHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
TAYLOR v. WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2016cv05182
Defendant:
WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP , BARBARA WALLACE and ROBERT SMITH
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
TAYLOR v. CHILDFIRST SERVICES, INC.
as 5:2016cv03175
Plaintiff:
CARLA TAYLOR
Defendant:
CHILDFIRST SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TAYLOR et al v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION et al
as 2:2015cv04873
Plaintiff:
DAVID W. TAYLOR, BRUCE KETTER and DONALD FREDERICK
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, MARK DIMONDSTEIN, PHILADELPHIA, PA AREA LOCAL 89 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
IDE et al v. A & N INSTALLATIONS, INC.
as 2:2015cv06063
Plaintiff:
JASON IDE , WALTER TAYLOR , STEPHEN MCINERNEY and others
Defendant:
A & N INSTALLATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
David Taylor v. United States Postmaster Gener
as 15-1897
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID W. TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTMASTER GENERAL
TAYLOR v. SOUTH STATE MATERIALS, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01439
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. TAYLOR
Defendant:
SOUTH STATE MATERIALS, LLC and CHESTER OTTINGER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TAYLOR v. DONAHOE
as 2:2014cv06642
Plaintiff:
DAVID W TAYLOR
Defendant:
PATRICK R DONAHOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Pinnacle Health System
as 1:2014cv00729
Plaintiff:
Shante Taylor
Defendant:
Pinnacle Health System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
QUARLES et al v. CITY OF CAMDEN
as 3:2014cv01401
Plaintiff:
TANYA QUARLES , ALBERTO GONZALEZ , SHELLIE DANIELS-JONES and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
