Cases 61 - 70 of 2,125
N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Health and Welfare Fund et al v. KAM Electric, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00800
Plaintiff:
N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Health and Welfare Fund, N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Pension Fund, N.E.C.A. Local Union No. 313 I.B.E.W. Deferred Income Plan and others
Defendant:
KAM Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. PURE GLASS LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03857
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES ANNUITY PLAN, TERRY NELSON and others
Defendant:
PURE GLASS LLC and MATTHEW M. STAFFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
I.U.O.E. LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND et al v. HIGHGATE HOTELS, LP
as 2:2023cv03589
Plaintiff:
IUOE LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND, I.U.O.E. LOCAL 68 PENSION FUND and MICHAEL MCGLYNN
Defendant:
HIGHGATE HOTELS LP and HIGHGATE HOTELS, LP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. IMPACT STOREFRONT DESIGNS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv03581
Plaintiff:
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, INTERNATIONAL PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES ANNUITY PLAN and others
Defendant:
IMPACT STOREFRONT DESIGNS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and MICHAEL P. MASTERSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Board of Trustees Plumbers and Pipefitters Local, et al v. Jones Lang Lasalle Americas Inc
as 23-2202
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 PENSION FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 ANNUITY FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO 74 WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS INC
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 9 et al v. BRIAN TREMATORE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
as 2:2023cv03490
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 9, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 9 SURETY FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 9 PENSION FUND and others
Defendant:
BRIAN TREMATORE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
I.U.O.E LOCAL 68 ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND ET AL v. PM HOTEL GROUP
as 2:2023cv03170
Plaintiff:
I.U.O.E LOCAL 68 ENGINEERS WELFARE FUND, I.U.O.E. LOCAL 68 ENGINEERS PENSION FUND, I.U.O.E. LOCAL 68 ENGINEERS EDUCATION FUND and others
Defendant:
PM HOTEL GROUP doing business as HILTON MEADOWLANDS HOTEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MILES ELEVATOR DOOR & CAB, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv02003
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PLAN and others
Defendant:
MILES ELEVATOR DOOR & CAB, INC., REBEKAH CRUZ and DANIEL CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CEMENT MASONS UNION LOCAL NO. 592 PENSION FUND et al
as 2:2023cv01752
Plaintiff:
CEMENT MASONS UNION LOCAL NO. 592 PENSION FUND, CEMENT MASONS UNION LOCAL NO. 592 WELFARE FUND, CEMENT MASONS' UNION LOCAL NO. 592 JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
GENTILE CONCRETE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
CEMENT MASONS UNION LOCAL NO. 592 PENSION FUND v. AURAND MASONRY CONTRACTORS, LLC
as 2:2023cv01727
Plaintiff:
CEMENT MASONS UNION LOCAL NO. 592 PENSION FUND, CEMENT MASONS UNION LOCAL NO. 592 WELFARE FUND, CEMENT MASONS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and others
Defendant:
AURAND MASONRY CONTRACTORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
