Labor Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 67 of 67
LEES et al v. MUNICH REINSURANCE AMERICA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03764
Plaintiff: RICHARD LEES and PAUL ROSSMANGO
Defendant: MUNICH REINSURANCE AMERICA, INC. , UNKNOWN JOHN DOES 1-5 and UNKNOWN ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCHIESER et al v. ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2011cv00333
Plaintiff: ROBERT SCHIESER and BRANDY PEERY
Defendant: ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS INCORPORATED , ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY OF PHOENIX LLC and UNKNOWN PARTIES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SMOLDEN et al v. VIGO INDUSTRIES et al
as 2:2010cv05689
Plaintiff: STEPHAN SMOLDEN, JR. , GERARD DEROGATIS, JR. and ANTHONY TUNISON
Defendant: VIGO INDUSTRIES, DAWN KELVER, GREGORY SCHILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RITZ v. CIGNA INSURANCE et al
as 2:2009cv05846
Plaintiff: JENNIFER RITZ
Defendant: CIGNA INSURANCE and JOHN DOES 1-10 ( a fictitious name for persons, firms or corporations presently unknown)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Type: Labor None
HERRERA v. WYETH et al
as 2:2008cv01066
Plaintiff: CARLOS M. HERRERA
Defendant: WYETH, WYETH SAVINGS PLAN COMMITTEE, WYETH SAVINGS PLAN-PUERTO RICO COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
STANFORD v. FOAMEX LP et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv04225
Plaintiff: WILLIAM STANFORD, JR. and WILLIAM STANFORD, JR.
Defendant: FOAMEX LP, FOAMEX LP, FOAMEX LP BENEFITS COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
THOMAS v. MCCOURT et al
as 3:2004cv05068
Plaintiff: STEPHANIE THOMAS, HAROLD HILL, DEBRA K. CRAIG and others
Defendant: DAVID C. MCCOURT, MICHAEL J. MAHONEY, COMPENSATION COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?