Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Yohn v. Amazon.com Service, LLC
as 1:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Yohn
Defendant:
Amazon.com Service, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
MANGAR et al v. AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
MALYSHA MANGAR and CHASELYNN BENAVIDES
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
MANGAR et al v. AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
MALYSHA MANGAR and CHASELYNN BENAVIDES
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
MUNIZ v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
as 5:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
BOBBY MUNIZ
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ORFI v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01698
Plaintiff:
JAQUAD ORFI and JAOUAD ORFI
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, JOHN DOES #1-10 (FICTITIOUS NAMES), ABC COMPANIES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Robert Harper v. Amazon.com Services Inc
as 23-1073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC and AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC, NKA Amazon.com Services LLC
ROBB v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC et al.
as 3:2022cv02214
Plaintiff:
EUGENIA ROBB
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC, AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
ADAMS v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv10959
Defendant:
AMAZON FULFILLMENT CENTER, AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH M. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JEMERSON v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2020cv08502
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE JEMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JEMERSON v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2020cv08502
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE JEMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
