Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KO v. HANAM DAEJI, INC et al
as 2:2023cv03209
Plaintiff:
EUNBIN KO
Defendant:
HANAM DAEJI, INC, KANG W LEE, SEJIN OH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
PIRIR v. HANAM DAEJI, INC et al
as 2:2023cv02951
Plaintiff:
Jose Alfredo Pirir
Defendant:
HANAM DAEJI, INC and KANG WON LEE
KO v. HANAM DAEJI, INC et al
as 2:2022cv06335
Plaintiff:
EUNBIN KO
Defendant:
HANAM DAEJI, INC, KANG W LEE, SEJIN OH and others
LI v. TNC CONSTRUCTION INC., et al
as 2:2018cv00804
Defendant:
TNC CONSTRUCTION INC.,, SMJ CONSTRUCTION TECH LLC, STEVE KANG and others
Plaintiff:
HAIDONG LI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHIN v. DONG HEA RESTAURANT (USA) CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
JIN YONG SHIN
Defendant:
DONG HEA RESTAURANT (USA) CORP., SUNG M. PARK, KANG WON LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ESPINOSA et al v. CAREFUL SHIRTS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01429
Plaintiff:
APOLONIO ESPINOSA , MINERVA OLMEDO and CARLOS ESPINOSA URAGA
Defendant:
CAREFUL SHIRTS, INC. , C & K LAUNDRY SYSTEMS, INC. , YONG W. KANG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LOOI v. WANG et al
as 2:2013cv01684
Plaintiff:
KANG WEY LOOI
Defendant:
MENG WANG and Q.J. GREEN GARDEN INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KIM v. KANG et al
as 2:2012cv01049
Plaintiff:
HYUNG Y. KIM and JEFFREY J. YIM
Defendant:
HEE O. KANG and HAIR CITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DONG v. REN'S GARDEN et al
as 3:2009cv05642
Plaintiff:
CUI FEN DONG
Defendant:
REN'S GARDEN, LE YONG REN, KANG MING REN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
BLOOD et al v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, ET AL
as 3:2008cv06123
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY C. BLOOD, NICHOLAS J. TUFANO, FREDERICK ALTRIETH and others
Defendant:
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and KODAK RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
