Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BUTTERFIELD v. TRIPLE CANOPY INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03144
Plaintiff:
DE'SEAN LAMAR BUTTERFIELD
Defendant:
TRIPLE CANOPY INC. and ALEX MILLER
WALSH v. LAMAR F&S INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
MARTIN J. WALSH
Defendant:
LAMAR F&S INC., MARO ENTERPRISES INC., MARIN RESTAURANTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BUTTERFIELD v. TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03610
Plaintiff:
DE'SEAN LAMAR BUTTERFIELD
Defendant:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC. and Constellis Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RODGERS v. NATION CARE, INC.
as 2:2020cv06151
Defendant:
NATION CARE, INC.
Plaintiff:
LAMAR RODGERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
MEDLEY et al v. ATLANTIC EXPOSITION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv15847
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROLLS, MARLON GIBBS, LAMAR MEDLEY and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES, INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, ATLANTIC EXPOSITION SERVICES, INC. and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS, AND ALLIED TRADES AFL-CIO CLC DISTRICT COUNCIL 711
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LAMAR v. UNUM GROUP
as 2:2019cv04177
Defendant:
UNUM GROUP
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE LAMAR
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Tannenbaum v. Lamar Contractors, LLC
as 3:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Tannenbaum
Defendant:
Lamar Contractors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY WELFARE FUND, INC. - PENSION FUND et al v. ESTATE OF DONALD LING
as 3:2013cv04279
Plaintiff:
TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY WELFARE FUND, INC. - PENSION FUND , TRUCKING EMPLOYEES OF NORTH JERSEY WELFARE FUND, INC. , EDWIN STIER and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF DONALD LING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
BEINHOWER et al v. GREIF BROTHERS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2010cv01525
Plaintiff:
LAMAR BEINHOWER , MICHAEL GENTOSO , NICHOLAS PICARELLO and others
Defendant:
GREIF BROTHERS CORPORATION and XYZ CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
