Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension, et al v. Laguna Dairy S.de R.L. de C.V., et al
as 23-3206
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL STATES SOUTHEAST & SOUTHWEST AREAS PENSION FUND and CHARLES A. WHOBREY, as Trustee
Defendant:
LAGUNA DAIRY S DE RL DE CV, a Mexican Corporation formerly known as Laguna Dairy, S.A. de C.V., LALA BRANDED PRODUCTS LLC, a Texas limited liability company formerly known as Lala Branded Products, Inc., GILSA REAL ESTATE CO LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company and others
Provenzano v. RLS Logistics et al
as 3:2018cv00997
Plaintiff:
Joseph Provenzano
Defendant:
RLS Logistics, RLS Cold Storage of Pittston, PA, Inc., Bill Jozefowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Derrick Askew v. RL Reppert Inc, et al
as 16-3943
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DERRICK ASKEW, for himself and as representative of similarly situated employees
Defendant - Appellant:
RL REPPERT INC, RICHARD REPPERT, RL REPPERT INC EMPLOYEES PROFIT SHARING 401K PLAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY J. REPPERT
Third Party - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PENSION ADMINISTRATORS & CONSULTANTS INC and KISTLER TIFFANY BENEFITS CORP
Derrick Askew v. R.L. Reppert, Inc., et al
as 16-3924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK ASKEW, for himself and as representative of similarly situated employees
Defendant - Appellee:
RL REPPERT INC, RICHARD REPPERT, TIMOTHY J. REPPERT and others
Third Party - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA PENSION ADMINISTRATORS & CONSULTANTS INC and KISTLER TIFFANY BENEFITS CORP
LEACH v. OLIVA SUPERMARKETS LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03174
Petitioner:
DAVID E LEACH , III
Respondent:
OLIVA SUPERMARKETS LLC , RL MARKETS I LLC and ALTER EGOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
PANNUNZIO v. RL CANNING, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04048
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL N. PANNUNZIO
Defendant:
RL CANNING, INC. and HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
