Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GARCIA v. PHO TODAY CGH LLC et al
as 2:2023cv20629
Plaintiff:
LUIS GARCIA
Defendant:
PHO TODAY CGH LLC, PHO TODAY EAST RUTHERFORD LLC and TU NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MELO v. RUTHERFORD CAR WASH, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv05305
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MELO
Defendant:
RUTHERFORD CAR WASH, INC. and NEW RUTHERFORD CAR WASH CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MELO v. RUTHERFORD CAR WASH, INC.
as 2:2022cv00952
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MELO
Defendant:
RUTHERFORD CAR WASH, INC.
TUMPA v. IOC-PA, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00112
Plaintiff:
ROBERT D. TUMPA, SR.
Defendant:
IOC-PA, LLC, ELDORADO RESORTS, INC. and MARY ANN RUTHERFORD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PEREZ v. MR. BRUNO'S EAST RUTHERFORD, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00675
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant:
MR. BRUNO'S EAST RUTHERFORD, LLC, David Ligas and Paul Ligas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 1262 AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND v. J.A.M. RUTHERFORD CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv06650
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 1262 AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
J.A.M. RUTHERFORD CORP., JGS SUPERMARKET CORP., RJC FOODS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MONK et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03533
Plaintiff:
ART MONK , DESIREE MONK , PHILLIP BOBO and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES LLC , RIDDELL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 1262 AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND et al v. J.A.M. RUTHERFORD CORP. et al
as 2:2008cv03915
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 1262 AND EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 1262 AND EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and TRUSTEES OF THE UFCW LOCAL 1262 AND EMPLOYERS LEGAL SERVICES FUND
Defendant:
J.A.M. RUTHERFORD CORP. and MARTIN EIDELSTEIN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
