Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TATE v. PHILLY SHIPYARD, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05076
Defendant:
KEITH RUSSEL, KARLA CARNEY, SIGNAL MUTUAL INDEMNITY ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TATE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
TATE v. ELWYN
as 2:2016cv02276
Plaintiff:
TERRELL TATE
Defendant:
ELWYN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
TATE v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
BRUCE TATE
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY , GE TRANSPORTATION , GE DISABILITY BENEFITS CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MURRAY v. GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORP. et al
as 3:2011cv00647
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MURRAY, MARK ZIMMERMAN, MARK LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spady et al v. Wesley College
as 1:2009cv00834
Plaintiff:
Christine M. Spady, Ronald Tate, James Frasier and others
Defendant:
Wesley College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TATE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2009cv01056
Plaintiff:
OTIS TATE
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TATE v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2007cv03481
Plaintiff:
LOLA G. TATE
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
TATE v. HARDROCK EXCAVATING, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00525
Plaintiff:
GREGORY S. TATE
Defendant:
HARDROCK EXCAVATING, LLC and MARTY R. SCHIMLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stewart and Tate, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan v. Courtney et al
as 1:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
Stewart and Tate, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan and Stewart and Tate, Inc. Employees Profit Sharing Plan
Defendant:
Tammy L. Courtney, Angela M. Courtney and Fred L. Adams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
