Cases 91 - 100 of 217
v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv04669
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Type:
Other Statutes
MARTIN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2016cv02945
Plaintiff:
LEILA CARDELLIA MARTIN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ORENGO v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2016cv02542
Plaintiff:
RUBEN ORENGO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
JONES v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2016cv01303
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD L JONES
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
TAYLOR v. WEINER et al
as 2:2016cv00811
Plaintiff:
FRANK J TAYLOR
Defendant:
RICHARD J. WEINER, DONALD S. GOLDMAN, MAURICE GALLIPOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VELEZ v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2016cv00307
Plaintiff:
JAIR VELEZ
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FUQUA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv08023
Plaintiff:
JOHN FUQUA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv06270
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LEWIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2015cv06275
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. LEWIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
