Cases 91 - 100 of 204
MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE et al v. VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01100
Plaintiff:
MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE , TOWNSHIP OF EAST BRANDYWINE and TOWNSHIP OF WEST BRADFORD
Defendant:
VERIZON PENNSYLVANIA LLC and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRAY v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD et al
as 3:2015cv05920
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN MURRAY
Defendant:
ANTHEM BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TQ Delta LLC v Verizon Communications Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00616
Plaintiff:
TQ Delta LLC
Defendant:
Verizon Communications Inc. , Verizon Services Corp. , Verizon Online LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
COHEN et al v. PA AS AS ASIGNEE AND DESIGNATED AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF PATIENT NM et al
as 3:2015cv03675
Plaintiff:
JASON D. COHEN, MD and FACS AND PROFESSIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES, PA
Defendant:
ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC. and VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SHEARER v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2015cv00514
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHEARER
Defendant:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP , VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and VODAFONE GROUP, PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARTKOWSKI v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01831
Plaintiff:
BRAD BARTKOWSKI
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and VERIZON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
