Cases 171 - 180 of 426,570
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kinsley Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Kinsley Roofing, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Kinsley Enterprises, Inc. and Kinseley Construction LLC
Defendant:
Kinsley Roofing, LLC and Nigel Correa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
CMPC USA, INC. v. GWSI, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02087
Plaintiff:
CMPC USA, INC.
Defendant:
GWSI, Inc., M. Gerace Enterprises, Inc., KEVIN BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
VAN HORN v. THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Defendant:
THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CARTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
DARIUS CARTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RODGERS v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02089
Plaintiff:
CANDACE RODGERS
Defendant:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LEE v. MCDONOUGH
as 2:2024cv02088
Plaintiff:
KATINA LEE
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LEUTHE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2024cv00714
Plaintiff:
AARON LEUTHE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
LEUTHE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00715
Plaintiff:
AARON LEUTHE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
