Cases 11 - 20 of 46
BURGIS et al v. BAYER CORP., et al
as 2:2016cv03589
Plaintiff:
MANDY BURGIS , AMANDA BURLESON , NATASHA BURNS and others
Defendant:
BAYER CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COFFEY v. CAMERON et al
as 1:2015cv00138
Petitioner:
JEROME COFFEY
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JARVIS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02904
Plaintiff:
CAROL COFFEY JARVIS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COFFEY v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03549
Plaintiff:
GLEN COFFEY
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFEY et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06353
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY COFFEY and JASON COFFEY
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC and J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORTUNE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05879
Plaintiff:
RONALD FORTUNE , MICHAEL HALL , MARY CLAYBORN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFEY v. MYLAD ORTHOPEDIC SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv02260
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE COFFEY
Defendant:
MYLAD ORTHOPEDIC SOLUTIONS, LLC and SCOTT G. EDWARDS, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFFEY v. GRAN MELIA GOLF RESORT PUERTO RICO
as 2:2012cv01773
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE COFFEY
Defendant:
GRAN MELIA GOLF RESORT PUERTO RICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
