Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Bates et al v. Delaware Health Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
Amy Bates, Janet Deering, Chris Harris and others
Defendant:
Delaware Health Corporation doing business as Harbor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center, Cadia Healthcare and Hoosier Care Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilson v. Carey et al
as 1:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
James A. Wilson
Defendant:
Carleton E. Carey, Sr., Kathleen M. Jennings, Richard T. Callery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lavender et al v. Carey et al
as 1:2013cv02042
Plaintiff:
Dewey Ray Lavender and Steven Warren
Defendant:
Carleton E. Carey, Sr., Scott Koenig , Kim Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Justice v. City of Dover et al
as 1:2013cv00213
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Justice
Defendant:
City of Dover, Carleton E. Carey, Sr. and James Hosfelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shahin et al v. City of Dover, Delaware et al
as 1:2012cv00604
Plaintiff:
Mazen Shahin and Nina Shahin
Defendant:
City of Dover, Delaware, Carleton E. Carey, Sr. and Cheryl A. Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dover v. Millman
as 1:2012cv00220
Plaintiff:
Carey Lynn Dover
Defendant:
Renee Millman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Carmike Cinemas et al
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
Corey Knight
Defendant:
Carmike Cinemas, Matthew Holman, William Anthony Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline F. Carey
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Nester et al
as 1:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Smith
Defendant:
Nester, Streadwick, R. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taubert et al v. Amtrak
as 1:2009cv00659
Plaintiff:
Mary B. Carey Taubert and Edward Taubert
Defendant:
Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
