Cases 11 - 20 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CELGENE CORPORATION v. DEVA HOLDING A.S.
as 2:2023cv02992
Plaintiff:
CELGENE CORPORATION
Defendant:
DEVA HOLDING A.S.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plumley v. Sesen Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Sesen Bio, Inc., Thomas Cannell, Jay S. Duker and others
Spencer et al v. CAMELBACK RESORT, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Derek Spencer, M. A.S. and N. G.S.
Defendant:
CAMELBACK RESORT, LLC, CMBK RESORT OPERATIONS, LLC d/b/a CAMELBACK MOUNTAIN RESORT and KSL RESORTS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Arcelik A.S. v. EI DuPont de Nemours & Co
as 22-2634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARCELIK A.S.
Defendant / Appellee:
EI DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO
BOYKIN et al v. PLATINUM HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02939
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BOYKIN
Defendant:
PLATINUM HEALTHCARE GROUP, LLC, PLATINUM HEALTH AT WESTGATE, LLC doing business as WESTGATE HILLS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER, APEX GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Yilport Holding A.S.
as 2:2022cv03025
In Re:
Yilport Holding A.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
IN RE APPLICATION OF YILPORT HOLDING A.S.
as 2:2022cv03028
Petitioner:
YILPORT HOLDING A.S.
In Re:
IN RE APPLICATION OF YILPORT HOLDING A.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv08279
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
