Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
ANDRY v. DAIICHI SANKYO INC ET AL
as 1:2017cv12161
Plaintiff: JOHN ANDRY
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03163
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ZIADAT et al v. TOYS R US
as 2:2014cv04051
Plaintiff: AUDREY ZIADAT and BRIAN ANDRIS
Defendant: TOYS R US
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KATZ, ET AL v. NEW JERSEY UROLOGY, LLC, ET AL
as 2:2014cv03510
Plaintiff: BARBARA KATZ , MELISSA BRADLEY-JONES , ANTONIA COLON and others
Defendant: NEW JERSEY UROLOGY, LLC and NEW JERSEY UROLOGY, LLC 401 (K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
In re: John W. Perotti, et al
as 13-3760
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: JOHN W. PEROTTI and PATRICK ROSELLI
Defendant - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID J. EBBERT, WALTER DOBUSHEK and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: RICHARD P. CONABOY
ANDRIE et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05059
Plaintiff: GEORGE ANDRIE , MARY LOU ANDRIE , ROSS BRUPBACHER and others
Defendant: NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andri Fnu v. Attorney General United State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1702
Petitioner: ANDRI FNU
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BURGESS-STRAUSS et al v. GARDEN SPOT FURNITURE, INC.
as 5:2010cv02586
Plaintiff: MARIE BURGESS-STRAUSS and ANDRIS STRAUSS
Defendant: GARDEN SPOT FURNITURE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDRIS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67885
Plaintiff: DOROTHY ANDRIS
Defendant: ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC, THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
v. GOMEZ
as 8:2010mc00080
Respondent: ANDRYS SOFIA GOMEZ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?