Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Earl Pondexter
as 13-3451
Petitioner:
In re: EARL A. PONDEXTER
Respondent:
GOVERNOR THOMAS CORBET, PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION, GERALD ROBINSON, Chairman and others
Nominal Respondent:
NORA B. FISCHER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Norman Shelton v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-1586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Assistant Director, WARDEN THOMAS, NORWOOD, Regional Director and others
Howard Hill, II v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 12-4337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD L. HILL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Director of Bureau of Prisons, WARDEN D. SCOTT DODRILL, Assistant Director of Correctional Programs Division and others
Parks v. Eric Holder, et al
as 12-3590
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES PARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of Bureau of Prisons, D. SCOTT DODRILL, Assistant Director of Correctional Programs Division and others
Banks v. Outlaw et al
as 1:2012cv00946
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Timothy C. Outlaw, Johnson, Trust Fund Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Meyers v. US Dist Ct MD PA, et al
as 11-1636
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
US DIST CT MD PA, ATTY GEN USA, DIR FED BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Al-Wahid Ali v. CMS Corr Med Ser, et al
as 11-1017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AL-WAHID ALI
Defendant - Appellee:
CMS CORR MED SER, NJ DEPT OF CORR, GEORGE HAYMAN, Commissioner NJDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
