Cases 11 - 20 of 74
PRICE v. HUTCHINSON et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
SEAN PRICE
Defendant:
WARDEN HUTCHINSON, OFFICER NERO and LT BLANKENSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANKENSHIP v. KIJAKAZI et al
as 2:2023cv00145
Plaintiff:
ALINA TAMARA BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones-Cedeno v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2022cv01834
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Quinones-Cedeno
Defendant:
Ms. J. Hutchinson, P. Torres, C. Weissman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
OBEY v. COLLIE et al.
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
GREGORY DEVON OBEY
Defendant:
OFFICER COLLIE, UNIT MANAGER COLLEY, OFFICER DONOGHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANKENSHIP v. REAL HELP SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
RONALD BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
REAL HELP SERVICES, LLC and JOSHUA TONECHA
Abernathy et al. v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Quint Abernathy, Deletha Adams, Brooke Anderson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aaron et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00800
Plaintiff:
Andy Aaron, Erlinda Acosta, Vicky Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
HASBAJRAMI v. BLANKENSHIP
as 1:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
AGRON HASBAJRAMI
Defendant:
LT. BLANKENSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
