Cases 11 - 20 of 54
ACKERSON v. CITIBANK ET AL.
as 2:2016cv05745
Plaintiff:
DAVE ACKERSON
Defendant:
CITIBANK , CITIGROUP, INC. , CITI CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DataMotion Texas, LLC v. CitiGroup, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01390
Plaintiff:
DataMotion Texas, LLC
Defendant:
CITIGROUP INC.
Counter_claimant:
CITIGROUP INC.
Counter_defendant:
DataMotion Texas, LLC
Consol_counter_defendant:
DataMotion Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
Mario Lopez Garza v. Citigroup Inc
as 16-8011
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MARIO ALBERTO LOPEZ GARZA, The executor of the estate of Hans Jorg Schneider Sauter
Defendant - Petitioner:
CITIGROUP INC
DEL GUIDICE v. CITIGROUP, INC, et al
as 2:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DEL GUIDICE
Defendant:
CITIGROUP, INC. and THE PLAN ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE OF CITIGROUP, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
In re: Dr. Lakshmi Arunachalam
as 15-3569
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DR. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM
Defendant - Respondent:
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP INC, WELLS FARGO BANK NA, KRONOS INC and others
Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD G. ANDREWS
Garza v. Citigroup Inc.
as 1:2015cv00537
Plaintiff:
Mario Alberto Lopez Garza
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frank Reed v. Citigroup Inc, et al
as 15-2094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK REED
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIGROUP INC, in care of Plan Administrator of Citigroup Inc., METLIFE GROUP INC, a New York Corporation and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO, a New York Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
