Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Wolters v. Samuels
as 3:2013cv01602
Plaintiff:
Andrew Wolters
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wolters v. Samuels
as 3:2013cv01217
Petitioner:
Andrew Wolters
Respondent:
Charles Samuels, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCALA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2013cv02381
Plaintiff:
JASON SCALA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES SAMUELS, JR., JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02520
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles Samuels, Jr., Harell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Diaz v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02507
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles Samuels, Jr., Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kates v. Thomas et al
as 3:2012cv02270
Petitioner:
David E Kates
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas, Charles Samuels, Jr. and Eric Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTIN v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2012cv02228
Plaintiff:
Judy Martin
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Jr. , Bryan Bledsoe , Unnamed Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2012cv03846
Plaintiff:
JUDY MARTIN
Defendant:
CHARLES SAMUELS, JR., BRYAN BLEDSOE, UNNAMED ASSOCIATE WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HIRSCH v. SAMUELS
as 1:2007cv04103
Petitioner:
MENACHEM HIRSCH
Respondent:
CHARLES SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TODD-MURGAS v. SAMUELS
as 1:2007cv01644
Petitioner:
CESAR TODD-MURGAS
Respondent:
CHARLES SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
