Cases 11 - 20 of 142
BUCKNER et al v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. BUCKNER and GAIL D. BUCKNER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Barry Portnoy v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-1638
Petitioner / Appellant:
BARRY CHARLES PORTNOY
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
MANENTE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS)
as 2:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
VITO MANENTE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Eric Clarkson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 23-1060
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC D. CLARKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
MANENTE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE et al
as 2:2022cv07524
Plaintiff:
VITO MANENTE and DENISE MANENTE
Defendant:
COMMISIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Maureen Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-3120
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAUREEN ROBINSON
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
John Crandall, et al v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-3109
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN K. CRANDALL and NIVES M. CRANDALL
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Donald L. DeMuth v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-3032
Petitioner / Appellant:
ESTATE OF WILLIAM E. DEMUTH JR. DONALD L. DEMUTH, EXECUTOR
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Ifeoma Ezekwo v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-2243
Petitioner / Appellant:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
BUCKNER et al v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
as 2:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. BUCKNER and GAIL D. BUCKNER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
