Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Hurst v. Benton Counselman et al
as 1:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Hurst
Defendant:
Benton Counselman, Jeffrey Horvath, Steven Getek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorman v. Correctional Medical Services Inc.
as 1:2010cv00854
Plaintiff:
Dean A. Dorman
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2010cv00753
Plaintiff:
Scott O. Johnson
Defendant:
G. R. Johnson, Correctional Medical Service and Tasha Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williamson v. Correct Care Services LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00754
Plaintiff:
David W. Williamson
Defendant:
Correct Care Services LLC, Correctional Medical Services Inc., Linda Galef-Surdo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowery v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00662
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Lowery
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services and Phil Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2010cv00623
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Rogers
Defendant:
Dale Rodgers, Correctional Medical Services, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00558
Plaintiff:
Edward Powell
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
