Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04661
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wheby v. Greenland Acquisition Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01758
Defendant: Yanming Liu, Yu Chen, Shan Cui and others
Plaintiff: Earl M. Wheby, Jr.
LIN-HENDEL et al v. AGRICULTURE BANK OF CHINA (ABCHINA) et al
as 2:2019cv16372
Defendant: AGRICULTURE BANK OF CHINA (ABCHINA), ZHOU MUBING, CAI DONG and others
Plaintiff: DR. CATHERINE GWEI-INN LIN-HENDEL and DR. RUDOLF HEINZ HENDEL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
JJ BADA OPERATING CORP. v. DOKDOYA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09194
Defendant: Hu Lin Cui, Dokdoya Inc. and Taejung Kim
Plaintiff: JJ Bada Operating Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Franchi v. ARMO BioSciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00805
Plaintiff: Adam Franchi
Defendant: ARMO BioSciences, Inc., Peter Van Vlasselaer, Xiangmin Cui and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Cui Hong Zheng v. Attorney General United State
as 15-2048
Petitioner: CUI HONG ZHENG
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cui Lin v. Attorney General United State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2616
Petitioner: CUI LIN
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cui Li v. Attorney General United State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2925
Petitioner: CUI HUA LI
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CUI v. KIM'S REJOICING NAILS AND COSMETICS INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01244
Plaintiff: DONGCHENG CUI
Defendant: KIM'S REJOICING NAILS AND COSMETICS INC. , SEUNG DUK KIM and CHUL WOONG KIM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CUI et al v. YOU CHUN PALISADES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv05243
Plaintiff: MEIYU CUI , JISHUN JIANG and SEGUNDO TAMAY
Defendant: YOU CHUN PALISADES CORPORATION and NAM JE PARK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?