Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Tucker v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01272
Defendant:
Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC , Hospira Worldwide, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Debbie Tucker and Robert Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barb et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2015cv01224
Plaintiff:
Ginger Barb and Debbie Barb
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McFall v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2015cv01104
Plaintiff:
Debbie McFall
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Allione v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Debbie Sue Allione
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nelson et al v. Wilson et al
as 1:2008cv00369
Plaintiff:
Debbie Nelson and KN
Defendant:
Daniel Wilson and State of Delaware Department of Services for Children, Youth, and Their Families, Division of Youth Rehabilitative Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Minner, Carl C. Danberg, Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rush v. Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
David R. Rush
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc., Scot Altman, Christine Malaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
