Cases 11 - 20 of 28
FELICIANO v. DOHMAN et al
as 2:2012cv04713
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. FELICIANO
Defendant:
THOMAS DOHMAN, WILLIAM F. RADLE, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DOHMAN et al
as 2:2011cv06890
Plaintiff:
REGINALD JACKSON
Defendant:
THOMAS DOHMAN, ETTA WILLIAMS and WILLIAM E. RADLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHER v. THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2011cv05167
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARCHER
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, TOM DOHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ et al v. SCI GRATERFORD PRISON AND STAFF et al
as 2:2011cv00307
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ and ELIZABETH GOMEZ
Defendant:
SCI GRATERFORD PRISON AND STAFF , DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, J. BLUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONROE v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv03798
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MONROE
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THOMAS DOHMAN, KARANZAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERKINS v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2009cv02522
Plaintiff:
EMMITT PERKINS
Defendant:
D. DIGUGLIELMO, G. ARASIN, MAJOR FIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. DIGULIELMO et al
as 2:2009cv02310
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Defendant:
SUPT. D. DIGULIELMO, T. DOHMAN, J. MOYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VELASQUEZ v. DIGULILMO et al
as 2:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN VELASQUEZ
Defendant:
DAVID DIGULILMO, JOHN K. MURRAY, A.S. WILLIAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGOS et al v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2008cv05718
Plaintiff:
NAZARIO BURGOS, ROBERT MASON and MUSTAFA BURTON
Defendant:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THOMAS DOHMAN, EDDA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLAIN v. LOZAR et al
as 2:2008cv04637
Plaintiff:
RALPH WILLIAM MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
LOZAR, D. WHITE, DOHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
