Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DeJesus v. Barraza
as 3:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Alexis DeJesus
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morales v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Petitioner:
Henry DeJesus Morales
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Warden Baraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARONE v. NEWHARD et al
as 5:2022cv04156
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R BARONE and MARICRUZ MEZA
Defendant:
ETHAN J NEWHARD and NATASHA DEJESUS BONILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
BARONE v. NEWHARD et al
as 2:2022cv04156
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R BARONE
Defendant:
ETHAN J NEWHARD and NATASHA DEJESUS BONILLA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
HERNANDEZ-DEJESUS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv02785
Plaintiff:
LUIS A. HERNANDEZ-DEJESUS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DeJesus v. Service Employees International Union, Local 668 et al
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Magdalena DeJesus
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union, Local 668 and Stephen Catanese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DEJESUS v. LUCEY et al
as 5:2021cv05469
Plaintiff:
ALEX DEJESUS
Defendant:
BILL LUCEY and MARTIN GARICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DeJesus v. Stinehart et al
as 4:2021cv01639
Plaintiff:
Alejandro DeJesus
Defendant:
John Stinehart, Courtney Rodgers, Jenna Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grullon Rivera v. Patel
as 2:2021cv03677
Plaintiff:
Soraya Grullon Rivera and Lizette DeJesus
Cross Claimant:
Rushi K. Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
