Cases 11 - 20 of 3,501
v. DENOVO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04064
Defendant:
DENOVO DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and DAVID PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVENPORT v. DENOVO DIAGNOSTICS, INC et al
as 2:2021cv04066
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVENPORT
Defendant:
DENOVO DIAGNOSTICS, INC and DAVID PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv15999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
CICCOTELLI v. GENMARK DIAGNOSTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01626
Defendant:
GERONIMO ACQUISITION CORP., JAMES FOX, LISA GILES and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Franchi v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00496
Defendant:
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., James Fox, Lisa M. Giles and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Franchi
Mancini v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00466
Defendant:
James Fox, Lisa Giles, Roche Holdings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mancini
Stein v. GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00454
Defendant:
GenMark Diagnostics, Inc., Lisa Giles, James Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
DAVIS v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2021cv02942
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC., NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
GLENDA DIAN DAVIS
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC. v. Physicians Stat Lab, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
Defendant:
Fulcrum Clinical Laboratories, Inc. and Physicians Stat Lab, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
