Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 99
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. OLD BRIDGE SPINE & WELLNESS CENTER, P.A. et al
as 3:2023cv01175
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: OLD BRIDGE SPINE & WELLNESS CENTER, P.A., PETER BUFANO, D.C., ARLENE KAZIO, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GEICO, et al v. Mount Prospect Chiropractic Center PA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1378
Plaintiff / Appellee: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO, GEICO INDEMNITY CO, GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE CO and others
Defendant: MOUNT PROSPECT CHIROPRACTIC CENTER PA, DBA Mount Prospect Health Center
Defendant / Appellee: TERRY MCSWEENEY, D.C.
Defendant / Appellant: HASSAN MEDICAL PAIN RELIEF AND WELLNESS CENTER LLC, DBA Hassan Spine and Sports Medicine and SHADY HASSAN, MD
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. IRONBOUND M.R.I. L.L.C. et al
as 2:2023cv00820
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Defendant: Ironbound M.R.I. L.L.C., MICHAEL DAVIT, Esther Davit and others
Defendant: Cliffside Park Imaging & Diagnostic Center, L.L.C. and CLIFFSIDE PARK IMAGING 7 DIAGNOSTIC CENTER, L.L.C.
Cross Claimant: STEVEN W. WINTER, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. POMERANTZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv18532
Defendant: Dmitriy Stolyar, East Brunswick Imaging Center, LLC, Allen Pomerantz, M.D. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. BRUNSWICK HEALTH PC et al
as 3:2022cv06496
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: BRUNSWICK HEALTH CENTER PC, BRUNSWICK PHYSICAL THERAPY CENTER INC, BLESSEN ABRAHAM, D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07139
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. CARING PAIN MANAGEMENT PC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv05017
Defendant: CARING PAIN MANAGEMENT PC, CAREON PAIN MANAGEMENT, JINGHUI XIE, M.D. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. KOPPEL, M.D. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv03413
Defendant: BRIAN BEAGIN, D.C., CLIFTON PAIN AND REHAB LLC, VINCENT SARACENO, D.C. and others
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO CASUALTY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv19408
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant: EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION d/b/a THE SPINE AND SPORTS HEALTH CENTER, ALEXANDER VISCO, M.D., MICHAEL KELLY, D.C. and others
Cross Claimant: RON BEN-MEIR
Cross Defendant: JOHN DE HOYOS, TORAL DOSHI and EAST COAST SPINE, JOINT AND SPORTS MEDICINE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?