Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Jon Baumgardner v. David Ebbert
as 13-2107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON BAUMGARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EBBERT, RILEY, R. LAINO and others
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS et al v. J. BALL & SONS, INC.
as 2:2012cv02065
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS and NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
J. BALL & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
BALL v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv46654
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. BALL
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BALL et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv64420
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. BALL and DONNA J. BALL
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv32448
Plaintiff:
BILLY J. BALL , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BALL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55174
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. BALL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Baumgardner v. Ebbert et al
as 4:2010cv01459
Plaintiff:
Jon Baumgardner
Defendant:
David J Ebbert, Riley, Debra Spotts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BALL v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv69673
Plaintiff:
BILLY J. BALL
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALL v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31165
Plaintiff:
BILLY J. BALL
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BALL et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv90635
Plaintiff:
GEORGE J BALL and KATHERINE J BALL
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK INC, GARLOCK INC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
