Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Hills v. USA
as 1:2016cv01061
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Willie L. Hills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Adkins et al v. Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Terry Ennis Adkins , Issac Aguilar , Sevim Aybulut and others
Defendant:
Kellogg Brown & Root, LLC , KBR, Inc. , Kellogg Brown & Root Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Howard Hill, II v. Z. Edinger, et al
as 15-1728
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD L. HILL, II
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O Z. EDINGER, J. FOURA, Activities Lieutenant, J. SEEBA and others
HILL v. SAMUELS et al
as 3:2013cv02984
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
J. L Norwood , J. E. Thomas and Vince Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESCHE et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05855
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND E. ESCHE , NOE D. ESQUIVEL , LEENORA EVANS and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knightbrook Insurance Company v. Del Val Staffing LLC, et al
as 13-3929
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KNIGHTBROOK INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEL VAL STAFFING LLC
Defendant:
CHARLES BARTLETT, JR.
Movant - Appellant:
CHARLES L. HILL, an incapacitated person, by and through his guardian of the person and estate
Hill v. Edinger et al
as 3:2013cv02442
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
Z. Edinger, J. Foura and John Doe # 1 - 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv00565
Petitioner:
Howard L. Hill, II
Respondent:
J. E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv00469
Petitioner:
Howard L. Hill, II
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Thomas
as 3:2013cv00213
Petitioner:
Howard L. Hill, II
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
