Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
SANDERS v. GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv88966
Plaintiff: JAMES L. SANDERS, JAMES L. SANDERS, LINDA SANDERS and others
Defendant: GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION, PFIZER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
SANDERS et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv85295
Plaintiff: LINDA SANDERS, LINDA SANDERS, LINDA SANDERS and others
Defendant: AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Flowers v. Schultz, et al
as 08-4442
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALFRED FLOWERS
Defendant - Appellee: PAUL SCHULTZ, LINDA SANDERS and BRIAN PATTON
SANDERS et al v. BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD. et al
as 2:2007cv04689
Plaintiff: LINDA SANDERS and CARROLL F. SANDERS, III
Defendant: BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD., REGENERATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SPINALGRAFT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAINES et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv66846
Plaintiff: CHARLES WARREN RAINES, JANEY RAINES, JANEY SUE RAINES and others
Defendant: AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FLOWERS v. SCHULTZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02035
Plaintiff: ALFRED FLOWERS
Defendant: PAUL SCHULTZ, LINDA SANDERS and BRIAN PATTON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FLOWERS v. SCHULTZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00045
Petitioner: ALFRED FLOWERS
Respondent: PAUL SCHULTZ, LINDA SANDERS and BRIAN PATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?