Cases 11 - 20 of 26
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI v. ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC et al
as 2:2017cv01466
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant:
ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC , RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHCHIE DE SILVA , SUKETU P. UPADHYAY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
CHEESE v. COOK et al
as 2:2017cv01423
Plaintiff:
TROY L CHEESE
Defendant:
JULIANNA M. COOK, TINA L. MEADOWS, XYZ EMPLOYER I-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Ebbert
as 4:2015cv01870
Petitioner:
Antwon M. Cook
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cook v. Thomas
as 1:2014cv00312
Petitioner:
Antwon M. Cook
Respondent:
J.E. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC. v. DSC VENTURES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06149
Plaintiff:
MAACO FRANCHISING, INC.
Defendant:
DSC VENTURES, INC., DONALD J. COOK and SUSAN M. COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
COOK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03080
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. COOK
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COOK et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.
as 2:2012cv01286
Plaintiff:
RANDALL M. COOK and SUZANNE J. COOK
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bartesch v. Cook et al
as 1:2011cv01173
Plaintiff:
Martin Bartesch
Defendant:
Brent M. Cook, Martin F. Petersen, John T. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
COOK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64853
Plaintiff:
VOYN L COOK and WINIFRED M COOK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. COOK et al
as 1:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ALLEN M. COOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
