Cases 11 - 20 of 30
In re: Jose Perez
as 14-4344
Petitioner:
In re: JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
PEREZ v. J. CROWN, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01767
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant:
J. CROWN, INC., WYNN SERVICES, INC., MMG LYNDHURST, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jose Perez v. Conner Blaine, et al
as 13-1302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE, Superintendent, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
PEREZ v. BISTRO FIDELCO, LLC. et al
as 2:2012cv05989
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant:
BISTRO FIDELCO, LLC., MARC E. BERSON and TED STAMPOULOS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Mike Perez
as 12-1608
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKE PEREZ, AKA Miguel Perez-Cintron, AKA Miguel Perez
USA v. Mike Perez
as 11-4349
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIKE PEREZ, AKA Miguel Perez-Cintron, AKA Miguel Perez
Jose Perez v. Conner Blaine, et al
as 11-4230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MIGUEL PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
CONNER BLAINE, Superintendent, ATTY GEN PA and DA LANCASTER
PEREZ et al v. KEYSTONE NAZARETH BANK AND TRUST
as 2:2009cv05560
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PEREZ and LISA PEREZ
Defendant:
KEYSTONE NAZARETH BANK AND TRUST
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
PEREZ et al v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv72006
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PEREZ and IRIS PEREZ
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, BORINQUEN INSULATION COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PEREZ et al v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv72010
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL PEREZ and IRIS PEREZ
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, AMERADA HESS CORPORATION, BORINQUEN INSULATION COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
