Cases 11 - 19 of 19
In re: Robert Hall
as 13-1687
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HALL
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY v. HALL
as 5:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ROBERT HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BATTS et al v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2012cv06717
Plaintiff:
ROOSEVELT A. BATTS, CHAL KENNEDY, MICHAEL MCCRAY and others
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, MICHAEL NUTTER and THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. ASTRUE
as 2:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HALL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HALL et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66154
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT HALL and KAY FRANCIS HALL
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HALL v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv70388
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HALL and ROBERT HALL
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., ALLIED SIGNAL, INC., ABNEY MILLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
APP PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC v. C.M.H. CARE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00315
Plaintiff:
APP PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
Defendant:
C.M.H. CARE GROUP, INC., CHRISTIAN M. HALL, PHILIP HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BRADLEY et al V. A.C.AND S.,INC.(A,ET AL
as 2:2007cv66351
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY M. BRADLEY, ELOSKIA BRADLEY, BOBBIE JEAN BRYANT and others
Defendant:
A C AND S, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC., AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
