Cases 11 - 20 of 24
SAUNDERS v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv16049
Defendant:
BARD DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SAUNDERS v. BARD DAVOL INC. et al
as 3:2018cv16049
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Defendant:
C.R. BARD INC. and BARD DAVOL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NUMERIC ANALYTICS, LLC v. MCCABE et al
as 2:2016cv00051
Defendant:
MCCABE, ANN MCCABE, KURT SCHRON and others
Plaintiff:
NUMERIC ANALYTICS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
In re: Robert Saunder
as 16-2611
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT SAUNDERS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
Robert Saunders v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 14-4643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR JACK MARKELL, FORMER COMMISSIONER CARL C. DANBERG, COMMISSIONER ROBERT COUPE and others
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CONNECTIONS CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, DR. LAURIE SPRAGA, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Saunders v. Attorney General of the State of Delaware
as 1:2013cv02000
Plaintiff:
Robert Saunders
Defendant:
Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Danberg et al
as 1:2013cv01276
Plaintiff:
Robert Saunders
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Vincent Carr, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAUNDERS v. HARLOW
as 2:2013cv03065
Petitioner:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Respondent:
MICHEAL HARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Saunders v. Jack Markell, et al
as 13-1950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK MARKELL, ANDREW H. LIPPSTONE, PERRY PHELPS and others
Saunders v. Markell et al
as 1:2011cv01078
Petitioner:
Robert Saunders
Respondent:
Jack Markell, Andrew H. Lippstone, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
