Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Reyes v. MVPGB, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv01649
Plaintiff:
Francisca Reyes
Defendant:
MVPGB, LLC and Subway Sandwich & Salads
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THOMAS, ET AL V PATEL, ET AL
as 2:2013cv01530
Defendant:
PRATIKKUM PATEL , DHAVAL PATEL , SUBWAY RESTAURANT and others
Plaintiff:
JAMEL THOMAS and JANUARY AARON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSEMAN v. SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ROSEMAN
Defendant:
SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. and DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
PENDRAK et al v. SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. et al
as 3:2013cv00918
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NOAH PENDRAK and JOHN FARLEY
Defendant:
SUBWAY SANDWICH SHOPS, INC. and DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. PATEL et al
as 1:2013cv00386
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
RAVI PATEL and SUBWAY SOUTH STAR ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
THOMPSON v. DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. et al
as 2:2011cv07749
Plaintiff:
NICOLE THOMPSON
Defendant:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. , SUBWAY FAN, INC., AVONDALE SUBWAY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. v. SINGH et al
as 3:2011cv01077
Plaintiff:
DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC.
Defendant:
AMRIK SINGH and FREEHOLD SUBWAY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
BAKER et al v. SUBWAY REAL ESTATE CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv03368
Plaintiff:
LOIS BAKER and SHAJAYS LLC
Defendant:
SUBWAY REAL ESTATE CORP., DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES INC. , JOHN DOE 1-9 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
