Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Olukayode Ojo v. Warden Elizabeth Detention Ctr
as 19-1179
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ELIZABETH DETENTION CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08725
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ojo v. Clarks Summit Hospitality,LLC et al
as 3:2017cv01064
Plaintiff:
Eunice Ojo
Defendant:
Clarks Summit Hospitality,LLC, Hospitality Cover Plus, LLC and Nichols Village Motor Inn, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1332
Olukayode Ojo v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 17-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILFREDO TORRES, CHIEF PRIOBATION OFFICER and MARIA GOODWATER
OJO v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01875
Petitioner:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Respondent:
JEFF SESSIONS , WILFREDO TORRES and MARIA GOODWATER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Olukayode Ojo v. Ann Luong, et al
as 16-2287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Defendant - Appellee:
ANN LUONG, BRIAN ENNESSER, MICHAEL BICKINGS and others
HUNTINGTON LEARNING CENTERS, INC. v. STARCO, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv08334
Plaintiff:
HUNTINGTON LEARNING CENTERS, INC.
Defendant:
STARCO, LLC, STELLA OJO and CLEMENT OJO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olukayode Ojo v. Ann Luong, et al
as 15-2356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Defendant - Appellee:
ANN LUONG, BRIAN ENNESSER, MICHAEL BICKINGS, "Mike" and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07951
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OJO v. LUONG et al
as 2:2014cv04347
Plaintiff:
OLUKAYODE DAVID OJO
Defendant:
ANN LUONG, BRIAN ENNESSER, MICHAEL "MIKE" BICKINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
