Cases 21 - 30 of 35
IP Communication Solutions LLC. v. AT&T Services Inc.
as 1:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
IP Communication Solutions LLC.
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
SCHWARTZ-WOODS et al v. AT&T, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05747
Plaintiff:
NIRA SCHWARTZ-WOODS, Ph.D. and NEHEMIA SCHWARTZ, Ph.D.
Defendant:
AT&T, INC. and AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ZIPPAY v. AT&T SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2014cv01243
Plaintiff:
SHEREE J. ZIPPAY
Defendant:
AT&T SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv05171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Execware LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00229
Plaintiff:
Execware LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , AT&T Services Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
CRFD Research Inc. v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 1:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
CRFD Research Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , AT&T Operations Inc. , AT&T Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Dragon Intellectual Property LLC v. AT&T Services Inc.
as 1:2013cv02061
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc.
Respondent:
Freitas Angell & Weinberg LLP, Bayard, P.A. and Robert E. Freitas
Plaintiff:
Dragon Intellectual Property LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Parallel Iron LLC v. T-Mobile USA Inc.
as 1:2013cv00307
Plaintiff:
Parallel Iron LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Services Inc. , T-Mobile USA Inc. , Verizon Services Corp. and others
Counter_claimant:
VMware Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Parallel Iron LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GlobeTecTrust LLC v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01235
Plaintiff:
GlobeTecTrust LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Inc. , AT&T Operations Inc. , AT&T Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
