Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES LLC et al v. FLOWERS BAKERIES BRANDS LLC
as 2:2014mc00265
Petitioner:
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES LLC and BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC.
Respondent:
FLOWERS BAKERIES BRANDS LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, LLC et al v. FLOWERS BAKERIES BRANDS, LLC
as 2:2014mc00266
Movant:
EARTHGRAINS BAKING COMPANIES, LLC and BIMBO BAKERIES USA, INC.
Respondent:
FLOWERS BAKERIES BRANDS, LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Orlando Rodriguez v. Michael Crum, et al
as 14-3353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Debtor - Appellee:
NATIONAL FREIGHT INC
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CRUM, DALLAS FOARD, KAROL KEMPKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Orlando Rodriguez v. National Freight Inc, et al
as 14-1748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL FREIGHT INC, MICHAEL CRUM, DALLAS FOARD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rodriguez v. National Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02083
Plaintiff:
Orlando Rodriguez
Defendant:
National Freight, Inc., Michael Crum, Dallas Foard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CZERWINSKI v. STROEHMANN & MAIERS et al
as 3:2011cv02976
Plaintiff:
WALTER CZERWINSKI
Defendant:
STROEHMANN & MAIERS , BIMBO BAKERIES USA , BAKERY DRIVERS AND SALESMAN LOCAL 701 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
