Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Javier Gomez v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 12-3568
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CITY OF LANCASTER, Lancaster County, STREET OPERATIONS GROUP LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, L.C.P. and others
GOMEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. et al
as 5:2012cv04524
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA., THE CITY OF LANCASTER (LANC. COUNTY), STREET OPERATIONS GROUP, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON (L.C.P.) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heath v. May et al
as 1:2012cv00846
Plaintiff:
Carla Heath
Defendant:
Robert May, Wendi Caple, Thomas Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond v. May et al
as 1:2012cv00391
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Drummond
Defendant:
Robert May, Wendi Caple, Thomas Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Correct Care et al
as 1:2012cv00265
Plaintiff:
Chevelle Morris
Defendant:
Correct Care, Wendi Caple, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andreasik v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00206
Plaintiff:
Linda Michelle Andreasik
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAPLES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv57043
Plaintiff:
JENE E. CAPLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Rhoades v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00589
Plaintiff:
Tia Rhoades
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burroughs v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00552
Plaintiff:
Jessica L. Burroughs
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00262
Plaintiff:
Sherrhonda L. Williams
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carter, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
