Cases 21 - 30 of 38
DICICCO et al v. CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. DICICCO and STACEY A. DICICCO
Defendant:
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HVIZDAK v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv00406
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. HVIZDAK
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA , RBS CITIZENS, NA , CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, NAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RIZZO et al v. CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv01366
Plaintiff:
R.A. RIZZO and K.L. RIZZO
Defendant:
CITIZENS BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA and CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TADOM v. CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
ALENE S. TADOM
Defendant:
CITIZENS FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. and LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Counter_claimant:
LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON
Counter_defendant:
ALENE S. TADOM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
