Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
Shawn T Jones
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Kimberly Clark, B. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardona v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Jose Cristobal Cardona
Defendant:
B.A. Bledsoe, D. Young, D. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Diaz v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv02519
Plaintiff:
Juan Diaz, Jr.
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles Samuels, Harrell Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
James Murray v. Warden Young, et al
as 12-4505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES MURRAY, AKA James Hines
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN D. YOUNG, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dameon Daley v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 12-3393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMEON DALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director of the BOP, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, K. REAR, Associate Warden and others
Murray v. Young et al
as 3:2012cv01673
Plaintiff:
James Murray
Defendant:
D Young, F.B.O.P., United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D Young
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Dorina Varner, Leilani Sears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton-El v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2011cv02354
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, D. Hudson, D. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Sutton-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ari Bailey v. Stephen Forostiak, et al
as 11-8093
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Respondent:
STEPHEN FOROSTIAK, Asbestos Coor. E.P.A., HARLEY G. LAPPIN, BOP Dir., CONNELLY, Asst. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
