Cases 21 - 30 of 15,143
Greg DeYoung v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 24-2049
Plaintiff:
GREG DEYOUNG
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BUCKS COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Mu'Mit Muhammad a/k/a Keith Lamont DrainIn re: Mu'Mit Muhammad a/k/a Keith Lamont Drain
as 24-1995
Petitioner:
In re: MU'MIT MUHAMMAD A/K/A KEITH LAMONT DRAIN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY CENTRE COUNTY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
NASH v. PHILA DISTRICT ATTY et al
as 2:2024cv02437
Plaintiff:
AASIM NASH
Defendant:
PHILA DISTRICT ATTY, PHILA PUB. DEF. and NEW VITAE DR. BEHR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Athens Area Joint School Authority
as 4:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Beth Hughes
Defendant:
Athens Area Joint School Authority doing business as Athens Area School District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mark BrownIn re: Mark Brown
as 24-1994
Petitioner:
In re: MARK A. BROWN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Jamal Ali v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2000
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ALI
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
DORSEY-GRIFFIN v. GOURLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02355
Petitioner:
HYKEIM DORSEY-GRIFFIN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MR. GOURLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
