Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Mitchell v. Emig et al
as 1:2022cv01542
Petitioner:
David A. Mitchell
Respondent:
Commissioner Robert Surles, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and Warden Brian Emig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher West v. Mark Emig, et al
as 22-3205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER H. WEST
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK EMIG and JEFFREY CAROTHERS
Abdul Rasheed v. Saez, et al
as 22-3106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDUL RASHEED
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. SAEZ, DOC/SCI-CAMP HILL, WARDEN CAMP HILL SCI, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER UNKNOWN, Unknown at this time and others
Defendant:
EMIG, Unknown at this time
EMIG v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ET AL
as 2:2018cv14084
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Merck & Co. d/b/a Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Emig
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 1:2018cv14084
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Merck & Co. d/b/a Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation
Plaintiff:
Susan Emig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Caple et al
as 1:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Tiera Tramaine Smith
Defendant:
Wendi Caple, Bryant Emig, Faith Levy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Evans et al
as 1:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
Walter Earl Allen, II
Defendant:
Carol Evans, Gray and Emig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaul v. Morgan et al
as 1:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gaul
Defendant:
Philip Morgan, Mark Emig, Zella Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Emig et al
as 1:2013cv02103
Plaintiff:
Christopher H. West
Defendant:
Mark Emig and Jeffrey Carothers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2013cv01149
Plaintiff:
David I. Walker
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Cynthia Spears and Emig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
