Cases 21 - 30 of 198
CARBONARO et al v. GLASSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. CARBONARO and CAROL MECCA
Defendant:
GLASSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT, PITMAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ROWAN UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCHEID v. FEIGIN et al
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE SCHEID
Defendant:
GERALD A. FEIGIN, EMMANUEL RODRIGUEZ, HALEY MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GILLIAM v. CAVALLARO et al
as 1:2021cv16844
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. GILLIAM
Defendant:
STEPHEN E. CAVALLARO, NICHOLAS J. RUSSO, JACK MANNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv13564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FREENY v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv18278
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COUNTY, ERIC FAGEN, JOHN DOE #5 and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO FREENY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12408
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CHINN v. DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2020cv10256
Defendant:
POLICE CHIEF KEVIN PANCOAST, GLOUCESTER COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, DEPTFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE INTERNAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS CHINN, ANNETTE CHINN and CHELSEY CHINN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HEATH v. GLOUCESTER COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv02049
Plaintiff:
ZENIDA HEATH
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP P/O #1, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP P/O #2, GLOUCESTER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.